Reliability of a new scale for essential tremor Reliability of a new scale for essential tremor Elble, Rodger; Comella, Cynthia; Fahn, Stanley; Hallett, Mark; Jankovic, Joseph; Juncos, Jorge L.; LeWitt, Peter; Lyons, Kelly; Ondo, William; Pahwa, Rajesh; Sethi, Kapil; Stover, Natividad; Tarsy, Daniel; Testa, Claudia; Tintner, Ron; Watts, Ray; Zesiewicz, Theresa 2012-10-01 00:00:00 Background: The objective of this study was to determine the reliability of a new scale for the clinical assessment of essential tremor. The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale contains 9 performance items that rate action tremor in the head, face, voice, limbs, and trunk from 0 to 4 in half‐point intervals.

Head and limb tremor ratings are defined by specific amplitude ranges in centimeters. Methods: Videos of 44 patients and 6 controls were rated by 10 specialists on 2 occasions 1–2 months apart. Inter‐ and intrarater reliability was assessed with a 2‐way random‐effects intraclass correlation, using an absolute agreement definition. Results: Inter‐ and intrarater intraclass correlations for head and upper‐limb tremor ranged from 0.86 to 0.96, and intraclass correlations for total score were 0.94 and 0.96.

The intraclass correlations for voice, face, trunk, and leg were less robust. Conclusions: This scale is an exceptionally reliable tool for the clinical assessment of essential tremor. © 2012 Movement Disorder Society Movement Disorders Wiley http://www.deepdyve.com/lp/wiley/reliability-of-a-new-scale-for-essential-tremor-e14Fj0OHiV. Abstract Background: The objective of this study was to determine the reliability of a new scale for the clinical assessment of essential tremor.

The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale contains 9 performance items that rate action tremor in the head, face, voice, limbs, and trunk from 0 to 4 in half‐point intervals. Head and limb tremor ratings are defined by specific amplitude ranges in centimeters. Methods: Videos of 44 patients and 6 controls were rated by 10 specialists on 2 occasions 1–2 months apart. Inter‐ and intrarater reliability was assessed with a 2‐way random‐effects intraclass correlation, using an absolute agreement definition. Download insaniquarium deluxe. Results: Inter‐ and intrarater intraclass correlations for head and upper‐limb tremor ranged from 0.86 to 0.96, and intraclass correlations for total score were 0.94 and 0.96. The intraclass correlations for voice, face, trunk, and leg were less robust. Conclusions: This scale is an exceptionally reliable tool for the clinical assessment of essential tremor.

© 2012 Movement Disorder Society Journal Movement Disorders – Wiley Published: Oct 1, 2012.

Download Fahn tremor rating scale pdf linux: Read Online Fahn tremor rating scale pdf linux: fahn tolosa marin tremor rating scale pdf tremor movie rating tetras tremorscale tremor scale tremor severity scale clinical rating scale for tremor (crst) tremor grading scale bain and findley clinical tremor rating scale Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale Pdf. Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale Pdf Image. Methods of tremor assessment include simple clinical observation, standardized rating scales, objective clinical assessment of drawn figures, and computerized tremor analysis. A broad overview of tremor, and the relative advantages and disadvantages of tremor assessment methods are discussed below.

Methods The large and small spirals of FTM were drawn with each hand on two consecutive days by 14 men and four women (age 60±8.7 years [mean±SD]) with mild to severe essential tremor. The drawings were simultaneously digitized with a digitizing tablet.