My friend's case, he was in a building where the designer aimed for beauty, not utility. Emphasizing understandability and usability, and experience de. From comfy t-shirts to cool hats to hilarious coffee mugs, the Breitbart store’s lifestyle line has something to fit every budget and Breitbart sensibility.

Soal spa polines 2014. Awali dengan langkah kecilmu, yups yakni mulai mencari soal spa polines yang tahun sebelumnya. Dan tentu gak hanya mencari tapi pelajari dan pahami. Oke gak usah panjang lebar, langsung download aja soal spa polines 2014 - Rekayasa.

HMS Endeavour off the coast of New Holland by c. Contents • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Construction [ ] Endeavour was originally the merchant collier Earl of Pembroke, built by Thomas Fishburn for Thomas Millner, launched in June 1764 from the coal and whaling port of in, and of a type known locally as the Whitby Cat. She was and sturdily built with a broad, flat, a square, and a long box-like body with a deep. A flat-bottomed design made her well-suited to sailing in shallow waters and allowed her to be for loading and unloading of cargo and for basic repairs without requiring a. Her, internal floors, and were built from traditional, her and from, and her masts from.

Plans of the ship also show a double to lock the keel, floors and frames in place. Some doubt exists about the height of her standing masts (excludes top and gallant masts ), as surviving diagrams of Endeavour depict the body of the vessel only, and not the mast plan. While her main and foremast standing spars (excludes top and gallant masts ) are accepted to be a standard (standards differed from shipyard to shipyard and country to country ) 69 and 65 feet (21 and 20 m), respectively from an annotation on one surviving ship plan in Greenwich NMM ZAZ6594 which records these lengths has the mizzen as '16 yards 29 inches' (15.4 m). If correct, this would produce an oddly truncated mast a full 9 feet (2.7 m) shorter than the standards of the day.

Late 20th-century research suggested the annotation may be a transcription error and should read '19 yards 29 inches' (18.1 m), which would more closely conform with both the naval standards (which standard? ) and the lengths of the other masts. A more recent critical review of contemporary sources doesn't require a supposed typo in 1771 to explain this shorter measurement for the mizzen whilst at the same time offers supporting evidence of its cap being at the taller supposed normal height. Sydney Parkinson's sketches and paintings of Cook's Bark Endeavour along with the 1771 Woolwich Yard Bark Endeavour spar measurements in Greenwich NMM ZAZ6594, and other contemporary sources suggest that the shorter mizzen mast was not stepped in the hold/keelson, but instead was stepped in the lower deck 10 ft above this as was sometimes done. This would bring its standing height at the cap to within a supposed normal height of around 8– 9 ft below the main mast cap and approx 5.5 ft below the foremast cap when comparing the heights of the standing mast tops (excludes top and gallant masts ) from the level of the water line. Whereas the shorter mizzen stepped in the hold on the keelson instead of the lower deck would make the standing mizzen cap 18 ft below the main mast cap which is clearly not the case when critically examining Sydney Parkinson's drawings and the contemporary painting titled HMS Endeavour off the coast of New Holland, by Samuel Atkins c. 1794 at the top of this page.